Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn't know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs— Claire Berlinski (@ClaireBerlinski) August 11, 2018
11 August 2018
In "Analysis"
Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn't know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs— Claire Berlinski (@ClaireBerlinski) August 11, 2018
11 August 2018
In "Analysis"
Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn't know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs— Claire Berlinski (@ClaireBerlinski) August 11, 2018
11 August 2018
In "Analysis"
RT @ClaireBerlinski: Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn’t know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs
Bunu paylaş:
İlgili
RT @ClaireBerlinski: Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn't know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs
Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn't know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs— Claire Berlinski (@ClaireBerlinski) August 11, 2018
11 August 2018
In "Analysis"
RT @ClaireBerlinski: Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn't know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs
Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn't know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs— Claire Berlinski (@ClaireBerlinski) August 11, 2018
11 August 2018
In "Analysis"
RT @ClaireBerlinski: Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn't know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs
Note the number of outright factual mistakes, ludicrous characterizations, and significant omissions in this editorial. Fine: The NYT doesn't know much about Turkey. But why not run this past someone who does before assuming this confident tone? https://t.co/Ykt364EfBs— Claire Berlinski (@ClaireBerlinski) August 11, 2018
11 August 2018
In "Analysis"